Reasonable Owners Compensation in Corporations
What an owner of a corporation pays themselves in wages should be reasonable. Tax audit risk differs between the corporate taxes structures your corporation elects. S Corporations should have higher vs. lower tax compensation. For instance an S Corporation that pays an owner $25,000, with tax profits of $100,000 post officer salaries, has an unreasonable compensation audit risk. Why? Because compensation is subject to payroll tax, but distributions are not. Some tax advisors may suggest that an S corporation shareholder pay themselves the lowest salary possible, and distribute the major of earnings through the accumulated adjustment account (AAA). AAA is a tax term for taxed S-Corporation retained earnings that can be distributed without any additional taxes. In an audit, the IRS can reclassify AAA distributions to wages and assess appropriate payroll taxes. A costly audit adjustment, not to mention the penalties that can be involved. Here’s how. Let’s say Ron owns 100% of 555 corporation stock, and 555 is an S-Corporation, and is the only employee. If 555 produces $150,000 of taxable earnings, net a $30,000 W-2 payment to Ron, the FICA tax combined with Ron and 555 will be $4,590. Let’s say Ron’s intrinsic value to the corporation is $85,000. This would result in $95,000 of taxable corporate earnings, net the $85,000 W-2. The additional $55,000 of taxable W-2 wages would result in $8,415 of additional FICA tax. So with a “managed” W-2, Ron can give himself a bonus of $8,000 a year. This is the IRS audit risk. Let’s say Ron follows this policy for 3 years, of paying himself only $30,000 on his W-2, and distributing the additional $55,000 as AAA distributions. If the IRS audits 555, he is subject to a $24,000+ FICA tax expense adjustment; plus penalties. What if Ron pays himself reasonable compensation…